Home Latest show Previous shows Presenters Forums Contact FAQ LugRadio Live Map Planet #lugradio

Clipboard does work! Klipper

General discussion about the LUGRadio shows.

Moderators: mrben, jono, matt, trig

mojavelinux
New to the freak show
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:12 am

Clipboard does work! Klipper

Postby mojavelinux on Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:26 am

I just had to jump in here after listening the discussion on clipboard management in Linux on this weeks show. I wanted to talk over you, but unfortunately, I don't have my own mic.

I believe that the concern is well founded. Clipboard management in Linux is totally botched. The problem is that once the application holding the clipboard contents quits, the content is flushed from the primary buffer. However, if you are running a super-daemon, such as KDE's klipper, which is just brilliant by the way, the clipboard content stays alive even after the death of the application. In fact, it can even keep up to 25 of the most recent selections. If you have never taken advantage of this feature in Klipper, you are really missing out!

Granted, I have read debates on how Klipper is a hack because it is essentially running as a vacuum cleaner to suck up anything and everything copied anywhere to make it available later. I say, "Who fucking cares, as long as I can get my clipboard selection." Now, that being said, while the hack is in place, perhaps a better solution should be developed. But until there is something, you are going to have to pry klipper from my dead body if you want to take it away from me, because Linux is unusable without it. Even now that I run Gnome, I still have Klipper kicking.

DanielT
Concerningly committed to LugRadio
 
Posts: 632
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2004 9:02 pm
Location: Manchester

Postby DanielT on Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:19 pm

BTW for gnome i use this:

http://members.chello.nl/~h.lai/gnome-c ... index.html

works fine.
Moo!

User avatar
Lord C
New to the freak show
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:44 am
Location: London, UK

Postby Lord C on Wed Mar 30, 2005 2:51 pm

DanielT wrote:BTW for gnome i use this:

http://members.chello.nl/~h.lai/gnome-c ... index.html

works fine.


That's cool.
Thanks
Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

User avatar
snecklifter
Knows their stuff
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:34 pm
Location: UK/West Yorks/Huddersfield

Postby snecklifter on Wed Mar 30, 2005 7:03 pm

Can anyone tell an ignoramus like me why this isnt in a stock version of GNOME?

Jack Burton
New to the freak show
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 4:58 pm
Location: Middlesbrough

Postby Jack Burton on Wed Mar 30, 2005 7:16 pm

coz its more important to have colour gradiated title bars, stupid eye candy and themeability than it is to have solid functionaility and good foundation....
Now you just listen to the old Pork Chop Express and take his advice on a dark and stormy night when the pillars of heaven are shakin'....

User avatar
Lord C
New to the freak show
 
Posts: 62
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:44 am
Location: London, UK

Postby Lord C on Wed Mar 30, 2005 9:10 pm

Jack Burton wrote:coz its more important to have colour gradiated title bars, stupid eye candy and themeability than it is to have solid functionaility and good foundation....


He said Gnome, not KDE ;)

*budum che*
Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.

User avatar
Aq
LugRadio Presenter
 
Posts: 2233
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 4:38 pm

Postby Aq on Thu Mar 31, 2005 1:44 am

snecklifter wrote:Can anyone tell an ignoramus like me why this isnt in a stock version of GNOME?


See http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop- ... 00193.html and the following thread. It's not necessarily as clear-cut as it might appear.

Aq.

mojavelinux
New to the freak show
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:12 am

klipper excels

Postby mojavelinux on Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:53 am

While I have followed the gnome-clipboard-daemon project, I still say that Klipper is a better application, even running under Gnome (which is my current configuration). Here are several reasons why:

1. klipper is simply good at what it does. It can pull from both the xselection and the copy buffer and it does a very good job at keeping the history ordered properly and in sync.

2. klipper left aligns entries, while gcd centers them :?

3. klipper can retain clipboard contents between logins.

4. klipper can perform actions on the clipboard contents (though I don't really use this feature).

5. klipper is accessible through dcop.

6. klipper can popup anywhere, not just out of the docklet icon.

There are features that klipper is missing, one which would be EXTREMELY helpful and which I have filed numerous feature enhancement requests. That feature would be the ability to "freeze" an entry so that it doesn't fall off the end of the list. For instance, that password that you need to keep handy until you commit it to memory, or something similar.
The best implementation I have seen for this feature is in the wmcliphist project.

If you still aren't convinced as to why we need a clipboard manager, try one for a few days and then attempt to go back. Nothing sucks worse then when you select something into your xselection, then accidently (without knowing) select something else and then are suprised when you go to paste that e-mail you copied and get an endline instead.

Oh, and Eclipse 3.1M5 finally works with the xselection properly, so working with Java and the clipboard just got way better.

User avatar
mrben
Unbelievable LugRadio community master
 
Posts: 3236
Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:27 am
Location: Glasgow

Postby mrben on Thu Mar 31, 2005 6:36 am

Re: klipper - how much other KDE stuff does it load when you use it?
mrBen
Carpe Aptenodytes

http://www.jedimoose.org

mojavelinux
New to the freak show
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 6:12 am

interesting that you ask

Postby mojavelinux on Sat Apr 02, 2005 4:17 am

mrben, it is interesting that you ask about the overhead, because that is exactly why one of my coworkers has held of on using it. In short, I think he is foolish. When a KDE app first starts, it does load up the kdeinit service, but the overhead is remarkably low. Most of the time it sits idle and the dock app is VERY, VERY quick to respond. I believe the reason for this is that KDE distinquishes between a window app and a windowless app (such as klipper).

My opinion is that it is silly to "avoid" kde just to prevent the kdeinit process from starting. At first I worried about it as well, but I assure you that it won't even leave a mark on your available resources. At least, that is my experience. KDE only starts libraries as needed, so running klipper does not automatically start artsd, dcop and other such services.

My feeling is that KDE has too much to offer to ignore it. By no means to you have to run KDE to take advantage of what it has to offer. I use applications that allow me to be productive, some are Gnome/GTK, some are KDE. Some are even Java (but Java eats resources like a fat kid consumes donuts). amaroK is another application that I simply cannot live without, but I digress.

User avatar
samurai
New to the freak show
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 9:59 pm

Postby samurai on Tue Apr 12, 2005 5:21 am

I don't use clipboard cut and pastes too often so I'm a little less concerned then most, but there is the old standby of Xclipboad. Its pretty kludgy, but provides some of the functionality you want :-)

User avatar
yonkeltron
Knows their stuff
 
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 8:08 pm
Location: Philadelphia LUG

Postby yonkeltron on Thu Apr 21, 2005 7:19 pm

samurai wrote:I don't use clipboard cut and pastes too often so I'm a little less concerned then most, but there is the old standby of Xclipboad. Its pretty kludgy, but provides some of the functionality you want :-)


the main word there is "some"...it provides "some of the functionality you want" and not all of it. as long as we the users settle for some of what we want, linux won't get stronger. if we turn around and fill in wishlists and file bugreports and maybe even add some features ourselves, we will make linux stronger.

i would never settle for some of the functionality that i want when i can get it all. granted i am an evil KDE user and i use MEPIS over ubuntu......but the point is that i know what i want and i know what i need and i make it my business to get it all working.


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 0 guests